I believe my job as a mentor is to help you meet your own goals. I don’t have a set curriculum. Nor do I have a rubric for what makes good poetry*. I will suggest books/readings/prompts based on your interests, and I will provide links and/or photocopies of relevant theory I think you’ll find relevant.
*My personal biases are toward narrative and Imagist poetry. Some of my favorite poets are Elizabeth Bishop, Albert Goldbath, Helge Torvund, and Patricia Fargnoli. I have a growing interest in eco-poetics and poetry-of-place. I am also working consciously to expand my personal cannon to include voices that have been/are marginalized. My Ph.D. work focused on (Eastern) formal poetry and found texts.
While I do like to discuss craft elements like line-breaks and diction, I promise never to rewrite your work!
In my experience with work-in-progress workshops and seminars, nothing upset me more than “group work” re-writes, or being edited to suit someone else’s voice. I believe poems are personal by definition.
I may suggest changing a word or a phrase for a specific reason – but I won’t change it for you, and will try to avoid providing specific alternatives.
I also believe a big part of mentoring is making sure you see your own strengths!
My suggestion for a basic structure for mentoring is similar to a graduate program term:
Time Frame: max. 4 months unless otherwise agreed-upon
Contents: After an initial letter of introduction and purpose or a zoom meeting, we would exchange 4 packets of work – Each packet consisting of a single page of questions you would like me to help you research – and up to 10 pages of poetry. I would ask for a maximum of 2 weeks for me to respond to each packet. It’s also possible to arrange a Zoom meeting following each pocket: to clarify my feedback and to allow for more discussion.
Compensation: My fee for the 4-packet commitment (including zoom meetings) is 250 USD sent via paypal.
Let me know if you have any questions.
I’m looking forward to hearing from you!